Irrlicht Engine

No, I meant that porting the .net part is probably more easy as .net code should be quite portable and probably run out-of-the-box on PDAs. But porting the C++ code is much more involved and will require a decent knowledge of mobile devices.
However, I just checked Irrlicht's portability recently ...

Porting just the .NET part won't be that much work once you have Irrlicht core ported. That's what I meant.
For all the rest just ask here if you encounter problems during the job. There are many people here interested in this port.

Hi hybrid. Thanks again :)

As my english is poor, just confirm ...

I don't know about .net and its support on mobile devices. Furthermore you have to port another thing when using Irrlicht.NET (as it requires Irrlicht) so it would be easier to use plain Irrlicht. Besides that, .net code should run anywhere, so this port might be easiest :)
I'd say it's a good ...

So best thing would be to come up with an OpenGL/ES driver for Irrlicht to support a vast majority of exisiting handhelds and consoles. I don't think that it is that much work to get it running in the first, things will be more complicated when actual target platforms are chosen.
Maybe a good ...

Well master, that's wrong.
Someone on the Ogre forums did a port of the engine, as i have that code here on my HD.

http://www.ogre3d.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15938&highlight

@mdsrlz just PM that guy, and you will get access to his svn version

Hi Magisterrivus.

Thanks for the answer, but I ...

Hi!

As a newbie ( ), I'd like to know if it's possible to use Irrlicht Engine (or any port of this) with Microsoft Direct3D for Windows Mobile 5.

Thanks!