Dev C++ Sigh.
Dev C++ Sigh.
Wow, Dev C++ has been playing up on me lately, this is on vista (another sigh) but I have had similar problems on my XP. First thing that happens is when I am organising header files and .cpp files into respective folders, after a while the names of the files just start to change for example CGame.h will be called CGameManager.h and sometimes .cpp will be called .h . This is superficial as it doesn't actually rename the file...
Now I think it has come to the last straw, it now has rendered itself completely useless. It won't save files and if I click anywhere in my code and write it won't compile it. Its just like one big useless text editor that can't save now.
Wtf? Any Ideas? Or should I not bother and go to VC 2008
Now I think it has come to the last straw, it now has rendered itself completely useless. It won't save files and if I click anywhere in my code and write it won't compile it. Its just like one big useless text editor that can't save now.
Wtf? Any Ideas? Or should I not bother and go to VC 2008
Programming Blog: http://www.uberwolf.com
Re: Dev C++ Sigh.
That's what I did. DevCpp just seems to brake down. I had never specifically had your problems, but I had tons of other ones, and VC08 works just fine.dejai wrote:Or should I not bother and go to VC 2008
I switched finaly to Code Blocks after many years with DevC++. I did it after I had to rename project file nearly each time I wanted to recompile my ap. For some reasons old executable could not be rewriten/removed before system restart.
While C::B has many small features over DevC++ two things were better in Dev: much easier setup. C::B project setup is really complicated (may be it gives you more flexibility, don't know) and text selection on doubleclick is broken if you want to select single character expression: double clicking on a; would select only a in Dev but both a and semicolon in C::B (may be there is way to set it up somewhere but I did not find it).
Project setup issue I simply solved by creating template project which I just copy and paste.
While C::B has many small features over DevC++ two things were better in Dev: much easier setup. C::B project setup is really complicated (may be it gives you more flexibility, don't know) and text selection on doubleclick is broken if you want to select single character expression: double clicking on a; would select only a in Dev but both a and semicolon in C::B (may be there is way to set it up somewhere but I did not find it).
Project setup issue I simply solved by creating template project which I just copy and paste.
-
- Admin
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:36 am
- Location: Scotland - gonnae no slag aff mah Engleesh
- Contact:
If you are primarily targeting an MS Windows platform, I cannot think of a single good reason to use anything other than Visual Studio (Express) as your main IDE.
I can think of some pretty bad reasons, mostly along the lines of "I prefer to use FOSS products, even though I would never in a million years consider compiling or debugging them myself".
I can think of some pretty bad reasons, mostly along the lines of "I prefer to use FOSS products, even though I would never in a million years consider compiling or debugging them myself".
Please upload candidate patches to the tracker.
Need help now? IRC to #irrlicht on irc.freenode.net
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Need help now? IRC to #irrlicht on irc.freenode.net
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
People need to stop calling DevC++ a compiler, and then they need to just plain stop using it. It's a buggy piece of junk, especially in later versions. They would crash hard all the time, and then the software got abandoned. Use Code::Blocks or VSC++2008 Express.
True. I dropped C::B like a bad habit a few months ago, and never looked back. But C::B runs better on a lower spec machine.rogerborg wrote:If you are primarily targeting an MS Windows platform, I cannot think of a single good reason to use anything other than Visual Studio (Express) as your main IDE.
I used Dev-C++ for all of a week and was disgusted, I now use C::B or Visual C++ 2008 (all the .net stuff gets annoying though (it generated 100mb of .obj files and such from a single compile.... when '03 made <1mb...), so I use C::B (with MSVC++ '03 for the compiler) a lot of the time)
"Surely we don’t need to waste resources on pathfinding; they just need to walk along the shortest route from one place to another." - EA Producer
-
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:04 am
Dev-C++ is alright, and in fact the choice of most beginners, especially since it is used in most books. I like to use it because it is lightweight, and I can get small projects down fast. But for anything else I use MSVC, although it is deathly slow. (Just like all MS products.)
TheQuestion = 2B || !2B
-
- Admin
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:36 am
- Location: Scotland - gonnae no slag aff mah Engleesh
- Contact:
Slow in what sense? Time spent compiling should be insignificant compared to design, coding, testing and debugging.
If compilation time bothers you, I'd recommend kjam Empirically, it compiles the same code using the same compiler (cl.exe) and options in half the time of doing the equivalent build through dev studio (on the command line) or gnu make.
If compilation time bothers you, I'd recommend kjam Empirically, it compiles the same code using the same compiler (cl.exe) and options in half the time of doing the equivalent build through dev studio (on the command line) or gnu make.
Please upload candidate patches to the tracker.
Need help now? IRC to #irrlicht on irc.freenode.net
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Need help now? IRC to #irrlicht on irc.freenode.net
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Slow in the sense that whenever I click something there is about 3 seconds lag. Buttons, menus, submenus, arrows to drop down menus, etc. There is so much stuff in MSVC that it bogs my system down. I generally have to close Internet Explorer and mIRC if I have either of them open because then it takes about 10 seconds to register clicks etc.
Even when editing code, with Irrlicht source code, there will be 3 character lag on my typing. It gets really annoying, but I am basically forced to use it.
Even when editing code, with Irrlicht source code, there will be 3 character lag on my typing. It gets really annoying, but I am basically forced to use it.
TheQuestion = 2B || !2B