That being said, there are some functions that are missing explanations and just some general things missing. Since I'm still a newbie at using Irrlicht, I don't know what a lot of the functions do or what they return; I've found that there is quite a bit of information missing from the documentation concerning valid parameters and what functions return (like if the return value is in pixels or units, for example). As I go through and learn what some of these functions do, I'd like to update the documentation with relevant information so that others wont have to put quite as much work into finding these things out.Is this a good idea? Do you guys think the documentation needs this, or would it just make it cluttered? How would I go about doing this? Should I just submit patches to the tracker with updated header files containing the updated descriptions, or is there a better way to go about this?
Thanks
-wyrmmage
