about build the sources

[zydgyy]

hi:
guys!
I want build the sources of this irrlicht-1.7.2 and my sources as console app,
but there is compile errors,do i modify IrrCompileConfig.h file,but how?
By the way, i use devcpp tool.
Please help me!!! thanks a lot!!

[Radikalizm]

Please post those compile errors, we can't help you out without those

[zydgyy]

these are some of errors: linker errors;
[Linker Error] undefined reference to `jpeg_std_error'
[Linker Error] undefined reference to `jpeg_destroy_decompress'
[Linker Error] undefined reference to `StretchDIBits@52'
[Linker Error] undefined reference to `StretchDIBits@52'
......[/img]

[omg_fail]

Did you link all .lib files in the project ?

[zydgyy]

so,where are they?i cant find them?!

[zydgyy]

is there anyone can help me,Please!?

[Iyad]

Does those errors happen when you compile your project or when you compile irrlicht? If it is in irrlicht, try to comment out the lines on the jpg library in irrcompileconfig.h.

[CuteAlien]

It looks like you don't link with the jpeglib.
Look for JPEGLIBOBJ in the Irrlicht makefile to see how we do it. I suppose you don't use the original Makefile for some reason?

[Mel]

Like with anyone who uses DevCPP, i repeat myself, switch to code::blocks, or Visual Studio Express. They are more complete, less buggy, and aren't outdated as DevCPP already is, and for the DirectX support, don't worry, download the latest SDK from Microsoft, it works the same with Code::BLOCKS and with Visual Studio. The DevCPP devpack is, besides outdated, slower than the original DXSDK

Compile the library using those IDE's and check again, It is worth, believe me.

[omg_fail]

^
Thats right .
I also started with dev c++ but with visual studio you have much more posibiletys.
And with compielers like visual studio , which are plattform com. you hav a better structure

[Mel]

I would also say that working with Code::blocks and Open GL would create almost fully portable programs.