wglext and glext in irrlicht SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

Discuss about anything related to the Irrlicht Engine, or read announcements about any significant features or usage changes.
Post Reply
devsh
Competition winner
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

wglext and glext in irrlicht SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

Post by devsh »

WHAT THE ACTUAL?!

I am surprised irrlicht openGL works!

why do you have a custom GLext header in irrlicht source, each time we recompile the whole thing uses the out-dated headers!
No wonder we get bugs
hybrid
Admin
Posts: 14143
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Oldenburg(Oldb), Germany
Contact:

Re: wglext and glext in irrlicht SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

Post by hybrid »

Why do you always complain before understanding anything at all?!?!?!?!?!?!?
devsh
Competition winner
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: wglext and glext in irrlicht SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

Post by devsh »

well I do know opengl lib are backwards compatibile, so shouldnt be a problem. But still annoying if you get udefs working with ogl 4.0
hybrid
Admin
Posts: 14143
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Oldenburg(Oldb), Germany
Contact:

Re: wglext and glext in irrlicht SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

Post by hybrid »

Well, I think you still don't get it. So here's the short story: The extension headers are mostly up-to-date. It will contain the newest versions from opengl.org and hence support all extensions you can have. If you need a very specific version you can either recompile Irrlicht with that header version, or just switch off extension pointers and use the library of your system directly. So you won't lose anything. However, providing a very recent header together with the engine will ensure that those 99.99% of people who have just some header on their system will have far better extension support.
So what is your problem?
Post Reply