what different between Commercial and opensouce

ttom · Post by **ttom** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:41 am

Dear all:
I do some experiment use the TV3D6 and irrlicht0.9 the same terrain and the same model. 100 model and polygon is about 30,000 tirangle. the TV3D6's fps 80 and irrlicht's fps 15.
Anyone has the comment
ttom

Guezt · Post by **Guezt** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:39 am

I think it's how the way u implement it with irrlicht
thats bring to just 15 fps.

Just like the way a commercial engine did to their engine,
to speed things up. The cool thing about open source
is that you can tweak it to the max to suite your needs.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:44 pm

ttom wrote:Dear all:
I do some experiment use the TV3D6 and irrlicht0.9 the same terrain and the same model. 100 model and polygon is about 30,000 tirangle. the TV3D6's fps 80 and irrlicht's fps 15.
Anyone has the comment
ttom

what videodriver did you use for irrlicht?

ps: if you dont like irrlicht, shut the f*** up, dont spam this forum, and piss off

afecelis · Post by **afecelis** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:55 pm

keep it down guys!

dunno what's wrong lately that everyone's cursing so much?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:39 pm

sorry afecelis, wont happen again!

i just was upset that this guy comes here and flames around how bad irrlicht is. and also why everyone is comparing opensource to commercial.

if you dont like irrlicht, just dont use it!

ttom · Post by **ttom** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:15 am

Dear All:
Sorry for that. I just do my project and it is the irrlicht. It is great engine, I really can modify what i want. But when I project grow up. I want more person on the screen. I found the phenomenon. So I had the question and I want to know how the commercial engine to do some thing.

Sorry again.
and sorry for my poor english.
ttom
I use the Ti4200 ,ram(1G) and CPU(AMD 1.5G), DX8 and DX9

MikeR · Post by **MikeR** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:18 am

It sounds like you need something along the lines of Raknet It is a network library.

laforced · Post by **laforced** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:45 am

@ttom-- In order to make anything beyond a wild guess, it
would be necessary to see a comparison chart as to
the exact mehods you employed in both systems.
Such as using the exact same model format in both.
The same textures. The lack of physics objects in either.
Why don't you make a chart showing the outline of all
the steps and procedures that you used. And make it
complete, how you set up the camera, octrees or not.
The use of any rendering techniques in either. Then
we can see if it is a true comparison, based on identical
techniques employed in both test applications. You may
also wish to provide links to these demos to provide a
better understanding as well. Then and only then can anyone
say with any type confidence that there really is a difference
and not just someone blowing smoke up the old keister.
Looking forward to your presentation.

MikeR · Post by **MikeR** » Fri Jun 03, 2005 2:48 am

It doesn't sound to me that he's looking for a comparison of a commercial and opensource engine. Just looking for answers to how the commercial engine implements it's functions, such as entities and such. He talks about muti user in his last post, that's why I gave him the link to raknet.

ttom · Post by **ttom** » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:13 am

I do some test use the sse to do the matrix4 but the speed is the same

Irrlicht Engine

what different between Commercial and opensouce

what different between Commercial and opensouce

Re: what different between Commercial and opensouce