Very nice, noreg, you seem to have missed the point completely .noreg wrote:Apart from that i find statements like "the development of Irrlicht is somehow undefined" quite discouraging for Niko. If you are "cool programmers" then simply make it better yourself, but don't even think of telling Niko a development plan.
"the development of Irrlicht is somehow undefined", is not discouraging to niko, it's discouraging for all others that want to contribute code to Irrlicht.
It is discouraging for me to contribute patches that improve irrlicht and not even getting one response about them.
I have made a few patches and only a very simple one ever made it to the engine. All others are just sitting on my hard disk. And some of them were/are quite interesting for a lot of people, mind you.
What's the point for me, since niko is busy with other things, to contribute code to irrlicht so that all of you can use it, if I know it would not have a chance to be accepted for inclusion? For example, I really want to add shadow mapping support but I 'm not going to do it because I know it doesn't have a chance of being accepted as a patch.
If this situation suits you fine, it's fine with me.
I, on the other hand, am not happy with it and that's what I posted on my first post in this thread...
Yiannis.