Irrlicht Engine

That's the point, there is no way to proof if a screenshot was made with irrlicht or is taken from a game or made with another engine.

is highly *modified* irrlicht allowed here?

Lambda wrote:That's the point, there is no way to proof if a screenshow was made with irrlicht or is taken from a game or made with another engine.

It's a matter of dignity

My Entry (architectural drawing created by a client of our system) is of a model created in a our CAD system using irrlicht as the rendering engine. The mesh datastructures (and interfaces) are our own. I am using the excellent XEffects (in this case) to add shadows to the model. Having entered this comp for the first time, I am surprised to see what appears to be 'commercial' images (e.g. from off the shelf games etc.) entered. Is this really in the spirit of the competition - are we not here to promote the excellence of the engine and OUR creativity in using it to the fullest?

Asp

the one posted by Acki was mainly a sarcasm.

mk.1 wrote:

Lambda wrote:That's the point, there is no way to proof if a screenshow was made with irrlicht or is taken from a game or made with another engine.

It's a matter of dignity

Yes, but not all the people cares about his dignity.

Virion wrote:the one posted by Acki was mainly a sarcasm.

at least you got it !!!
no, just joking, I think there where some others too, like wITTus...

the main problem is how would one prove if the screenshots are from own work using Irrlicht...

I'm sure all others are legitime participants and all their screenies are looking pretty good...

Did I miss something? Wing64 entered using Irrlicht right?

Maybe we can stick a model saying "IRRLICHT3D" in all the scenes?

Or provide a demo with every screenshot?

Both of which wouldn't be appropriate for a large or commercial project, so they can't be necessary. But if you want to provide them to gain more credibility then go ahead.

I know wing64 is using Irrlicht, he struggled to get PSSM working and some other effects and now he is reaping the benefits.

Lol, I don't think that people would lie for that that not like the winner was rewarded by cash money.

LOL wITTus you made my day

Sorry for answer late. There are shaders used in Gothic scene.
1. PSSM for shadow mapping techniques -> http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~fzhang/pssm_project/
2. Normalmap with 4 lights -> 4 light normalmapping for animated meshes [C++/GLSL] http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=21186
3. Phong and Lambert shader -> XEffects - Reloaded - New Release (V 1.2)
http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=30631
4. TGMs ShaderPack for basic shader fx eg. Bloom, Blur. -> http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=21057
5. DOF -> http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=18788
6. HDR from render monkey example (not perfect and i hope next version of XEffect have this feature).
4. About polycount in this scene amount ~377,881 Triangles.
Thanks for interested us job.

wing64 wrote:Sorry for answer late. There are shaders used in Gothic scene.
1. PSSM for shadow mapping techniques -> http://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~fzhang/pssm_project/
2. Normalmap with 4 lights -> 4 light normalmapping for animated meshes [C++/GLSL] http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=21186
3. Phong and Lambert shader -> XEffects - Reloaded - New Release (V 1.2)
http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=30631
4. TGMs ShaderPack for basic shader fx eg. Bloom, Blur. -> http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=21057
5. DOF -> http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=18788
6. HDR from render monkey example (not perfect and i hope next version of XEffect have this feature).
4. About polycount in this scene amount ~377,881 Triangles.
Thanks for interested us job.

It's hard for me to combine them all Like using more than 1 shader at time. Have some problems with settingRenderTarget.

U can see a good example for combine various shader fx from XEffect.
Cheer.