Page 60 of 104
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:22 am
by Mel
No, sometimes so much acronyms can be annoying. But that is what technology has.
With regard to highligting the best features of my screens... Mmmm... i think you do that much better than me
Besides, that is a somewhat subjective opinion, some may find good things outside the places where i pointed. For instance, you seem to be missing the antialiasing the image has
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:27 am
by sudi
created a little explosion effect with irrlicht.
Video:
Uploaded with
ImageShack.us
Uploaded with
ImageShack.us
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:59 am
by Radikalizm
@Sudi:
That looks awesome
Any chance of seeing it in a game(demo)?
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:50 am
by Virion
Radikalizm wrote:@Sudi:
That looks awesome
Any chance of seeing it in a game(demo)?
yeah that looks really cool! or maybe a video?
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:03 am
by sudi
Virion wrote:Radikalizm wrote:@Sudi:
That looks awesome
Any chance of seeing it in a game(demo)?
yeah that looks really cool! or maybe a video?
there are two videos in the post
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:53 pm
by Virion
Sudi wrote:Virion wrote:Radikalizm wrote:@Sudi:
That looks awesome
Any chance of seeing it in a game(demo)?
yeah that looks really cool! or maybe a video?
there are two videos in the post
didnt saw it
looks awesome
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:13 pm
by cobra
It looks like you're using SPARK, and it also looks like for the base of it you're using the explosion effects from the SPARK explosion demo.
I ported the explosion demo effects to work with Irrlicht for my game, too.
SPARK Particle Engine is really nice.
Anyway, these are pictures from five months ago during the early SPARK implementation that I started:
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:57 pm
by sudi
actually no its not spark or spark related. i just got sick of the irrlicht particle system so i created one that works better.
I followed an article on gamedev on how to create such an effect. i then wrote a particle system that supports the needed features.
http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/_ ... fect-r2701
but my effect is missing some serious color correction...i really suck at art...
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:15 pm
by devsh
SERIOUSLY PEOPLE.... USE SOFT PARTICLES!
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:36 pm
by cobra
devsh wrote:SERIOUSLY PEOPLE.... USE SOFT PARTICLES!
A finished game is far more important than soft particles.
If more people would figure this simple fact out, there would be less incomplete projects with "good" graphics.
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:10 am
by Lonesome Ducky
Soft particles isn't worth a depth pass if you aren't already using one.
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:32 am
by Mel
cobra wrote:devsh wrote:SERIOUSLY PEOPLE.... USE SOFT PARTICLES!
A finished game is far more important than soft particles.
If more people would figure this simple fact out, there would be less incomplete projects with "good" graphics.
It also happens that games with good graphics need much more time to finish properly.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:54 pm
by devsh
SSAO+SSGI bitches!
The following are darker to show the GI
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:27 pm
by Radikalizm
@devsh: why not post an end result instead of just the result from you technique? a screenshot with only SSAO calculation and indirect lighting looks pretty boring, and I'd be interested to see this in a complete scene
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:48 pm
by loki1985
Radikalizm wrote:@devsh: why not post an end result instead of just the result from you technique? a screenshot with only SSAO calculation and indirect lighting looks pretty boring, and I'd be interested to see this in a complete scene
i had the same idea after seeing the screens. i will try to put it in a way which equals devshs own charming way to express constructive criticism:
SERIOUSLY DEVSH... USE TEXTURES!
