Irrlicht Engine

THE VERY Advanced irrFontTool (ver 3.7~2b) by Nikolay Atanassov

32-bit MS Win XP+ (NO Linux, WINE....)

TrueType (TTF) fonts to 32 bits (Display Device Indipendant) ARGB Bitmap font - BMP, PNG, TGA font (TTF2BMP,TTF2PNG,TTF2TGA)
ARGB Colors
Gradinet Colors
Create Semi-transperant fonts
Up to 2 outlines
Outline Glow effect
... and more...

Save TO: irrXML font, dot Delimited font

*** UpDate 30.07.2012 ***

THE VERY Advanced irrFontTool (ver 3.7~2b) by Nikolay Atanassov + SOURCE
Here is THE SOURCE of my First... and Last... C++ program

Download (Exe ONLY)... TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool.rar
Download (Exe +SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool+SOURCE.rar

Download (Text2Image DEMO+SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-Text2Image_DEMO+SOURCE.rar




Semi-transperant font








Simple black Outline


THE VERY Advanced irrFontTool (ver 3.7~2b) by Nikolay Atanassov + SOURCE
Here is THE SOURCE of my First... and Last... C++ program

Download (Exe ONLY)... TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool.rar
Download (Exe +SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool+SOURCE.rar

Download (Text2Image DEMO+SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-Text2Image_DEMO+SOURCE.rar




THE VERY Advanced irrFontTool (ver 3.7~2b) by Nikolay Atanassov + SOURCE
Here is THE SOURCE of my First... and Last... C++ program

Download (Exe ONLY)... TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool.rar - it's 101% Virus FREE
Download (Exe +SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-TheVeryAdvancedIrrFontTool+SOURCE.rar

Download (Text2Image DEMO+SOURCE)... irrlicht-1.7.1-Text2Image_DEMO+SOURCE.rar


Symantec (Anti-Virus) - Suspicious.Insight (in http://www.virustotal.com) is a FALSE POSITIVE
!!! It shows the same FALSE POSITIVE result for the "FontTool.exe" from the IrrLicht 1.7.1 SDK

WOW nice one.

wow, i wanted a font what has border, and wondered how could i hack it but.. man u saved me a lot of work!
thanks :3

Мерси, колега! Май ще му намерим приложение...
(Thanks, pal! Will become useful...)

This looks really cool, especially considering irrlicht limitation on in-built fonts.
Nice project man.

Irrlicht needs to integrate some tools such as this, after testing etc. of course.

**EDIT** We'd need the source of course

a-squared 4.5.0.50 2010.03.17 -
AhnLab-V3 5.0.0.2 2010.03.16 -
AntiVir 8.2.1.180 2010.03.16 -
Antiy-AVL 2.0.3.7 2010.03.16 -
Authentium 5.2.0.5 2010.03.17 -
Avast 4.8.1351.0 2010.03.16 -
Avast5 5.0.332.0 2010.03.16 -
AVG 9.0.0.787 2010.03.17 -
BitDefender 7.2 2010.03.17 -
CAT-QuickHeal 10.00 2010.03.17 -
ClamAV 0.96.0.0-git 2010.03.17 -
Comodo 4289 2010.03.17 -
DrWeb 5.0.1.12222 2010.03.17 -
eSafe 7.0.17.0 2010.03.16 -
eTrust-Vet 35.2.7365 2010.03.16 -
F-Prot 4.5.1.85 2010.03.17 -
F-Secure 9.0.15370.0 2010.03.17 -
Fortinet 4.0.14.0 2010.03.15 -
GData 19 2010.03.17 -
Ikarus T3.1.1.80.0 2010.03.17 -
Jiangmin 13.0.900 2010.03.16 -
K7AntiVirus 7.10.999 2010.03.16 -
Kaspersky 7.0.0.125 2010.03.17 -
McAfee 5922 2010.03.16 -
McAfee+Artemis 5922 2010.03.16 -
McAfee-GW-Edition 6.8.5 2010.03.16 -
Microsoft 1.5605 2010.03.16 -
NOD32 4950 2010.03.16 -
Norman 6.04.08 2010.03.16 -
nProtect 2009.1.8.0 2010.03.16 -
Panda 10.0.2.6 2010.03.16 -
PCTools 7.0.3.5 2010.03.15 -
Prevx 3.0 2010.03.17 -
Rising 22.39.01.07 2010.03.17 -
Sophos 4.51.0 2010.03.17 -
Sunbelt 5927 2010.03.17 -
Symantec 20091.2.0.41 2010.03.17 Suspicious.Insight
TheHacker 6.5.2.0.235 2010.03.17 -
TrendMicro 9.120.0.1004 2010.03.16 -
VBA32 3.12.12.2 2010.03.16 -
ViRobot 2010.3.17.2231 2010.03.17 -
VirusBuster 5.0.27.0 2010.03.16 -

Well, could be a false positive, but i won't run that executable. Will you release the source?

WOW nice one. You maybe upload share source code for Irrlicht. Thanks

Symantec finds some irr demos suspicious... I couldn't run the GUI Demo with AV 2010 it blocked it.

ellemayo wrote:Symantec finds some irr demos suspicious... I couldn't run the GUI Demo with AV 2010 it blocked it.

I just checked 05.UserInterface.exe from the SDK and Symantec indeed shows the same result Suspicious.Insight.

Means i won't run Irrlichts example binaries anymore.

virus scanners are ghay
i just executed the file, and had no problem.
maybe u should consider stop using virus scanners what marks every exe as a virus >.>

B@z wrote:virus scanners are ghay

Slowly awakening sexuality of an adolescent?
How can software have a sexuality? Do you even give your source files dirty names?

B@z wrote:i just executed the file, and had no problem.

Well, that's the problem with malware. You usually never have visible problems if you installed malware. Until the cops knock at your door because you distributed child porn.

B@z wrote:maybe u should consider stop using virus scanners what marks every exe as a virus >.>

Well, i don't use that scanner, VirusTotal does. Additionally, it doesn't mark every exe as virus.

If you want to increase your post count, please do it in a helpful way.

sometimes it happens. just send your file to the anti-virus company and i'm sure they will patch this up in next update.

randomMesh, if you won't tolerate existence of false positives, you'll easily realize that also breathing normal air will cause severe diseases etc. I guess Michael Jackson is a good example where this can lead. Also, the recent new food intolerance tests (IIRC it's called Igg test) show that simply testing things won't help, you also need to interpret and assess test results. So IMHO your posts with virus scanner results are also barely above a pure post count increase. At least if only one of more than a dozen tools claims to have found a suspicious code fragment.

Well, i think you got me wrong there. I'll try to explain.

hybrid wrote:randomMesh, if you won't tolerate existence of false positives...

I do accept the fact that there's the possibility of false positives.
That's why i wrote "could be a false positive" in my first post and used the smiley in my 2nd.

hybrid wrote:simply testing things won't help, you also need to interpret and assess test results.

That's correct. Unfortunately, i am not a computer security software company with all the options to check if a false positive is *really* a false positive.
So i leave the responsibility to the people who actually want to run the executable.

hybrid wrote:So IMHO your posts with virus scanner results are also barely above a pure post count increase.

Well, in the first post i asked for sources, in the second post i confirmed ellemayos statement that Symantec marks Irrlichts examples as suspicious. Third post just was a reaction of B@z pubescent use of the word 'gay', which was unnecessary indeed.
I don't need a high post count since quality!=quantity.

hybrid wrote:At least if only one of more than a dozen tools claims to have found a suspicious code fragment.

This is invalid. Even if only 1 out of 20000 tools would claim suspicious code, there's the possibility (even a tiny one) that the checked executable contains malicous code and the other 19999 scanners are just blind. So it's better to check twice.

randomMesh wrote:

ellemayo wrote:Symantec finds some irr demos suspicious... I couldn't run the GUI Demo with AV 2010 it blocked it.

I just checked 05.UserInterface.exe from the SDK and Symantec indeed shows the same result Suspicious.Insight.

Means i won't run Irrlichts example binaries anymore.

it also can be an compiler issue...
I once had a prog that my firewall (Norton) claimed to connect to the internet (see post) and it seemed this was caused by the used (MS) compiler...