Irrlicht Engine

what do you guys think would be better. Having a gem that allows the usage of irrlicht in ruby, or having only a binding lib. so one can push irrlicht objects to ruby and perform actions?

Edit: or do you think ruby is just a stupid idea for a 3d engine

I tinkered a little with embedding ruby and thought well why not try with irrlicht. this is a really basic start with just a few function to get something on screen. The code is actually not that nice to read. Could be cleaned up and the bindings could be done via templates. But yeah this was actual...

Also, would it be possible to use deferred lighting as a post process effect, so there would be no need to set special material for each mesh? One could write his own shader for a mesh and then use lighting as a post process effect. You don't know how deferred lightning works right... You render th...

sure

thanhle wrote:These looks awesome.
ent1ty and Sudi why don't you guy working together and incorporate this into Irrlicht next release?

Entity?

another short one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGkxWrC9hN0

Are you sure you rebuild irrlicht and it didn't work after that? Are you linking the newly compiled lib? Try removing every Irrlicht.dll and libIrrlicht.a you have. Then recompile.

Mallot1 wrote:

Sudi wrote:link the compiler runtime lib staticly with:

-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc

as compiler flags

do you set those in the #defines tab?

I think it was "Linker Settings" -> "other linker options"
and please don't pm if you don't get an answer right away....

link the compiler runtime lib staticly with:

-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc

as compiler flags

and a voxel renderer

(click the image for a video)

Youtube

Are you on linux? do you have more than one irrlicht on your computer? did you install the irrlicht dlls at some point? is maybe netbeans looking for headers or libs from the other version?

andres wrote:In 2010 i found a similar implementation (http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/forum/v ... =9&t=38987)
but it seems to be unfinished until now.

Actually it is finished. But of course with all code and programms it can always be improved.

but seriously just check the source code...its there....right there

serengeor wrote:

Sudi wrote:and besides that i am pretty certain that the camera receives events when you call IrrlichtDevice::run and not on ISceneManager::drawAll

what about animators, they won't get called, or will they?

Animators are run inside the drawAll call before rendering.

and besides that i am pretty certain that the camera receives events when you call IrrlichtDevice::run and not on ISceneManager::drawAll