Should Irrlicht.net CP replace Irrlicht.net?

not_a_commie · Post by **not_a_commie** » Tue May 15, 2007 8:29 pm

I'm apologize if this horse is dead, but I put this poll in the forum to see what people really think of the Irrlicht.net binding that ships with the main Irlicht C++ package. My feeling is that if it's not complete and doesn't follow the .NET standards and conventions then it's not worth keeping. As it is, having two primary .NET bindings confuses users.

roxaz · Post by **roxaz** » Tue May 15, 2007 9:54 pm

nice pool with no answer like "I like official .NET port". I like official one

not_a_commie · Post by **not_a_commie** » Tue May 15, 2007 10:04 pm

Good point. I added it.

noreg · Post by **noreg** » Tue May 15, 2007 10:57 pm

What kinda poll is that, where you can only choose different options of yes and one at best indefinate? Where is the " No, i don't like CP, this is perverted" option?

Luben · Post by **Luben** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:30 pm

Delight · Post by **Delight** » Thu May 17, 2007 10:16 am

Definitely Irrlicht.NetCP. It's the only port which allows serious development with irrlicht using .net