Interesting 3D images and videos (Not necesarilly Irrlicht)

ent1ty · Post by **ent1ty** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:35 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHNWj8HmWwQ

But how?

ChaiRuiPeng · Post by **ChaiRuiPeng** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:14 pm

ent1ty wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHNWj8HmWwQ

But how?

magick of the computer gods

ent1ty · Post by **ent1ty** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:19 pm

Unfortunately, i do not believe in higher power, not even when it's incorrectly spelled.

Mel · Post by **Mel** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:28 pm

Interesting video. Very impressive. I guess that is the advantage of a deferred renderer.

Luben · Post by **Luben** » Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:35 pm

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 4:33 pm

A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768

EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added

This uses 64-bit HDR

ChaiRuiPeng · Post by **ChaiRuiPeng** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:19 pm

Radikalizm wrote:A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768

impressive

pippy3 · Post by **pippy3** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:16 pm

Radikalizm wrote:A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768

EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added

This uses 64-bit HDR

That looks very sexy

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:20 pm

pippy3 wrote:
Radikalizm wrote:A screenshot from a test-scene I did for checking performance on semi-huge maps in my engine
Using a deferred renderer (ditched general support for my forward renderer), hardware 2D rendering, SSGI and SSAO (which still need tweaking) and a lame screenspace water shader which still needs a lot of work (it's actually just volumetric fog right now)

Runs smoothly at 80-100 FPS with 34 active dynamic lights at a resolution of 1024x768

EDIT:

Same scene tonemapped and with a bloom shader added

This uses 64-bit HDR

That looks very sexy

Thanks

This engine has almost been in development for a year now, so I'm pretty proud of the result I'm able to get already

jibblesmgee · Post by **jibblesmgee** » Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:59 pm

I think you have to use the Chinese MilkyWay super computer to run that CryEngine for cinema... that's why it's "coming soon"

freetimecoder · Post by **freetimecoder** » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:13 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgS67BwPfFY&hd=1

soon can't be far away

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:20 pm

freetimecoder wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgS67BwPfFY&hd=1

soon can't be far away

You'd need a monster of a machine to run that at interactive rates at a decent resolution...

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:35 pm

For those interested, here's a flythrough of my test-scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXaTtxjOMx4

serengeor · Post by **serengeor** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:59 am

Radikalizm wrote:For those interested, here's a flythrough of my test-scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXaTtxjOMx4

Looks nice

What are those objects at 0:47? skybox?

REDDemon · Post by **REDDemon** » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:05 am

I don't think we will have videogames with CryEngine 3 for a long time and when they will come they will need incredible powerfully machines for running.