Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:34 pm
@stefbuet Looks great 
Whats that red thing rotating around ?
Whats that red thing rotating around ?
Irrlicht Engine
Official forum of the Irrlicht Engine
https://irrlicht.sourceforge.io/forum/
Post your Irrlicht gameplay video here
Page 5 of 18
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:38 pm
The red area is just not covered by the shadow calculation. In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders, 1 render can cover half of the scene, and here I just did 1 render as it was a test case.
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:22 pm
I asked about this on IRC and they said it's impossible.stefbuet wrote:In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders
Fools.
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:41 pm
Who said it was impossible? I was under the impression that dual paraboloid mapping was well known... They should be ashamedent1ty wrote:I asked about this on IRC and they said it's impossible.stefbuet wrote:In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders
Fools.
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:10 pm
Well i don't remember exact names, it was like a month ago or so.
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:32 am
God Tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnaxGR81XE
Framework: ARSA
Rendering: irrlicht
Physics: PhysX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnaxGR81XE
Framework: ARSA
Rendering: irrlicht
Physics: PhysX
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:02 am
@wing64:
more closeups of the dancing chick hehe
more closeups of the dancing chick hehe
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:57 pm
@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:40 am
wondering... what's the game about? or is it just a demo showing physics?wing64 wrote:God Tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnaxGR81XE
Framework: ARSA
Rendering: irrlicht
Physics: PhysX
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:54 pm
It has a bit low resolution. Other than that, it looks awesome Good job Wing64!
Good job Wing64!Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:20 am
Thank you all.
@Virion:
A demo showing physics, shader and sandbox.
@Virion:
A demo showing physics, shader and sandbox.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:40 am
i see. i thought it would be a fighting game where the level will shakes and things will fall down for increasing difficulty based on time.wing64 wrote:Thank you all.
@Virion:
A demo showing physics, shader and sandbox.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:53 pm
A TEN!? for what?!Escen wrote:@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive
@wing64 - what in the hell is that supposed to be exactly?
@jake-GR - you need to get out more often!
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:36 am
Burn yourself before it's not too late.Midnight wrote:A TEN!? for what?!Escen wrote:@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive
@wing64 - what in the hell is that supposed to be exactly?
@jake-GR - you need to get out more often!
And go under your bridge, mister. To burn yourself.
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:59 pm
What Midnight is trying to say is that there is really nothing unique, ground-breaking, or technical in the video. So where the rating comes from is hard to tell.
The artwork is very nice; I'd give that an eight or nine.
Rating as a game, I'd give it zero. It's probably just starting its new life anyway, so that might be a premature rating.
Graphics before game-play is a dead game right off the bat, usually.
Sorry if that sounds harsh.
The artwork is very nice; I'd give that an eight or nine.
Rating as a game, I'd give it zero. It's probably just starting its new life anyway, so that might be a premature rating.
Graphics before game-play is a dead game right off the bat, usually.
Sorry if that sounds harsh.