Irrlicht Engine

Regardless of submitting it to the patch tracker can you please post it here too in code tags. I think a lot of people would benefit from that.

Regards,

Pinky

Each of OWN2.EXE and OWN3.EXE do not exit properly, you have to kill them from the task manager.

Have a look at the Makefiles in the examples directory.

To compile an example, type 'make'.

If you want to use an IDE like KDevelop, you have to first understand which libraries to include, and what your include files are!

Hehe, users that are fooled by those lame tactics deserve every trojan they install on their computer!

Have you checked the normal vectors of your polys on the models that don't shade to make sure they are facing outwards?

@LukePH - great stuff mate. It's really coming along, and a great effort for one person.

@BlindSide - hey, what's wrong with my soldier model damn it!? You laugh, kiwi. Why don't you show everyone your robot then? :P

Anyone that wants to laugh at my soldier model: http://img205.imageshack.us ...

Yeah, Panda, as mentioned above

I made a UV-mapped character, used Character Studio biped to animate it, exported with Panda to .X format, and it works fine in Irrlicht. I did it in both Max 6 and Max 8.

sio2 wrote:Nice. Has this been applied to SVN do you know?

(15th Jan) This patch has not been applied to SVN.

Irrlicht's collision is rudimentary. I wouldn't use it. Use a collision library instead, for example OPCODE ( http://www.codercorner.com/Opcode.htm ).

Did you have a look at the tutorial demonstrating rendering 2D objects? That uses transparency. It's in the examples directory of the distribution.

You could generate a patch file with your diff program - that's a commonly used technique.

Or if it's one major change, and a few minor changes, just post it here in [ code ] tags.

If it's very clean, and works properly, you may want to submit it to the patch tracker for the devs to have a look at ...

Have a look here:

http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=11986

Hi Magnet,

Firstly can you clarify your questions a bit. It's difficult to understand.

Secondly, what language are you translating from? (To C#). I assume it's C++. The main reason for doing this is to decrease development time - that's the whole idea behind a managed language like any .NET ...