Irrlicht Engine

That's interesting considering I can't get OGLES 1.x to bind textures, havent tried 2.0. Did you have to make any adjustments to your irrlicht compilation to get textures working for 1.x? What version of irrlicht - 1.7-beta ?

This is still an issue as I am getting the same problem, does anybody have a fix? I will look for an answer myself and post back with results if no one else can

EDIT

Lot of work later and a crap load of asserts and debug logs, I can't help but feel it's the underlying android ogl... I"m using ...

For those also coming across an "Arguments list too long" error when compiling Irrlicht (and other things), a fix is to add this to your JNI Android.mk file:
################################################################
#following code is modified copy of `cmd-build-shared-library` from %NDK ...

Hey hey - saw this thread ages ago but never really cared for it since I didn't have an android... now that I do however - i'm interested! I've been dinking around in Java with jpct-ae, libgdx and even raw Opengl. I cannot find a new framework/engine to really call my home, Irrlicht's 3d scene graph ...

Scaling your simulation is the best way, but not too small. Moving objects that are < 0.2 units in any dimension could result in tunneling, so plan accordingly.

I've had to scale my simulation by 2 because my smallest gun is a pistol that has a width of 0.1 and I was having a really hard time ...

Is there a way to prevent the whitewash outline of invisible nodes?

I tried manipulating the shadow mode flag to 'exclude' and 'cast none' but it still shows this 'white wash' outline of the invisible model.

I might pick around the XEffects source and add a check for scene node visibility to ...

I believe camera scenenodes now have a 'bindTargetAndRotation' flag that, if enabled, allows you to rotate and orient a camera via setRotation. You would just add your accelerometer rotations ontop of the set rotation.

Hmm I'm trying to get XEffects to work as a 'sun' source for my map/terrain.

I've been messing with using just 1 light, really far away with a small field of view and the proper near/far values, as well as multiple lights, but I just can't seem to get shadows that A.) don't flicker/cull as you pan ...

I haven't seen one of these yet, an Irrlicht Bullet rag doll, not the source code to one anyways...

There is this great bullet rag doll example that is entirely render-engine independent, strictly Bullet goodness by Marten Svanfeldt. I was able to hack it around and get it running with Irrlicht ...

Kordman916 - I'd love to answer your question so you may get onto developing your application, but I don't have the answer.

I would imagine you'd need Irrlicht 1.7.1, IrrBP and Bullet libraries all compiled under your compiler.

Use CMake to configure Bullet to build for your compiler, build it ...

The idea is your Irrlicht node is connected to your bullet 'body'. So you should alter your bullet 'body' in your simulation to get your irrlicht node to do as you like.

And so, I believe you aren't supposed to directly set physics components after the initial setup stage for the simulation, so you ...

hmm... I'm having issues with the GLSH shaders for the Blood effect.. It works - but while any of the blood effects are active, my skybox/dome has 'fog' enabled which makes it turn colors. Same with the particle system itself, all the particles have the fog color'd background. I can't figure out why ...

Zurzaza - I've added to your library a smidge by adding a collision-filter group number and bitmask to CIrrBPCollisionObject. I updated all the rigid bodies construtors with a default collision filter group number and bitmask so it's still backwards compatible or w/e. Basically This allows for the ...

serengor - I read that your problem is because the objects are deactivated. Deleting one doesn't notify the one above it anything has changed. Try activating the one you delete. I think I also read somewhere that that won't work either, something about a 'deactivation list'. The only alternative I ...

I thought objects accelerated at the same rate, regardless of mass?