I think winrar still archives like a champ. It compressed better for me than 7zip.ent1ty wrote:Rhymes with moronic... who the hell uses winrar nowadays?
Image to 8bits NES style!!!
No they are notroelor wrote:The images in the main post are dead.
winrar is good, but its not worth the money, as there are better free archiving tools now.roelor wrote: I think winrar still archives like a champ. It compressed better for me than 7zip.
Working on game: Marrbles (Currently stopped).
Yeah, I think not much people didkazymjir wrote:Hmm... did anybody ever paid for that program?serengeor wrote: winrar is good, but its not worth the money, as there are better free archiving tools now.
It even was on list of the most pirated software few years ago
Working on game: Marrbles (Currently stopped).
-
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:50 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the clouds.. drinking pink lemonade and sunshine..
i think its stupid that big company expect people to pay for something that has so much good (and free) competition in terms of compression software.serengeor wrote:Yeah, I think not much people didkazymjir wrote:Hmm... did anybody ever paid for that program?serengeor wrote: winrar is good, but its not worth the money, as there are better free archiving tools now.
It even was on list of the most pirated software few years ago
ent1ty wrote: success is a matter of concentration and desire
at a cost measure in computer resourcesButler Lampson wrote: all problems in Computer Science can be solved by another level of indirection