IrrBullet or just plain bullet? Which is the best way?

[Cube_]

Title.
should I use IrrBullet or Just Plain Bullet. I have a hard time deciding....

[mongoose7]

If you're a man, you will just use Bullet.

[Radikalizm]

Plain bullet really isn't hard to learn or implement, it's all pretty straight-forward once you get used to the concepts of a physics engine
I'd say go for vanilla bullet and implement some minimal functions for doing vector and quaternion conversion, you'll be good to go once you get that done

[serengeor]

I'd say go for vanilla bullet and implement some minimal functions for doing vector and quaternion conversion, you'll be good to go once you get that done

What exactly is vanilla bullet?

[Radikalizm]

I'd say go for vanilla bullet and implement some minimal functions for doing vector and quaternion conversion, you'll be good to go once you get that done

What exactly is vanilla bullet?

vanilla == regular :p it's an expression

[serengeor]

I'd say go for vanilla bullet and implement some minimal functions for doing vector and quaternion conversion, you'll be good to go once you get that done

What exactly is vanilla bullet?

vanilla == regular :p it's an expression

I see, didn't know that
I'll agree than, use vanilla (haha, learned something new ) bullet to get full control. Bullet was the first engine that I got to work and it wasn't that hard to implement after I found some minimal samples and adopted/extended them to my needs.

[mongoose7]

Vanilla = plain. Like vanilla ice-cream - no chocolate!

[Granyte]

if you need some really simple functionality only go for the wrappers they cover and abstract it quite well if you ever plan to use some of the more advanced feature go for pure bullet anyway you will end up writing your own wrapper

[Cube_]

nah. I will need more than simple. thanks for the help guys! Then that is what I'll do