Light DirectX SDK (april 2005) - 6,8mb filesize

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:33 pm

hi!

because the dxsdk is 155 mb big and many people cannot download that much / dont have the time, i thought i would upload a lighter version.

i removed the Documentation and the Samples folder and compressed it with winrar.

it has 6,8mb , so a lot smaller than the original.

ps: if something like this already exist please tell me. if not, it would be really nice of someone would host this file since my crappy lycos account has very limited bandwith

link (rightclick/save as..):

http://mitglied.lycos.de/animespy2003/d ... 9.0SDK.rar

bal · Post by **bal** » Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:15 pm

I provided a mirror at: http://users.skynet.be/balleke/irrlicht ... 9.0SDK.rar

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:26 pm

thx very nuch bal

r2d2 · Post by **r2d2** » Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:34 pm

You removed the documentation? You should be killed for that

RTFM

I think the docs are important... I know Microsoft's docs are not always the best but without documentation the whole think is a bit naked...

eXodus · Post by **eXodus** » Sun Jun 05, 2005 12:35 am

I'm not sure you can redistribute the SDK, let alone modify it.

Not long ago, I think DevCpp had such problems with devpacks.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:12 am

eXodus wrote:I'm not sure you can redistribute the SDK, let alone modify it.

Not long ago, I think DevCpp had such problems with devpacks.

i dont care about unless microsoft sends me an email ... or i do it like this: if someone wants to have it, drop me a pm and i´ll mail you the file. i guess no one here is going to microsoft and tells them that i "modify" their sdk (removed 2 folders ..) and publish it to the net because i actually did something useful for the community

You removed the documentation? You should be killed for that Wink RTFM Wink Wink Wink Wink
I think the docs are important... I know Microsoft's docs are not always the best but without documentation the whole think is a bit naked...

why do you need the documentation if you want to recompile irrlicht?

i didnt say that this is the sdk replacement, but you still need the dxsdk to recompile irrlicht and therefore you will need the files that comes with this lite sdk pack

MikeR · Post by **MikeR** » Sun Jun 05, 2005 1:51 am

Thankyou GFX.

I've downloaded it. If you need another mirror, I can mirror it too.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:36 am

exdodus that was meant friendly, i didnt want to offend you (if you thought i would do that)

zardoz · Post by **zardoz** » Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:49 am

GFXstyLER,

thank you very much!

eXodus · Post by **eXodus** » Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:30 am

GFXstyLER wrote:exdodus that was meant friendly, i didnt want to offend you (if you thought i would do that)

If you already read some of my post, you'll know I'm not the kind of person who will misinterpret and bitch about what you said or not

With that said, all I wanted to do was sharing a little bit of information to avoid problems both to you and this forum.