Post your Irrlicht gameplay video here

serengeor · Post by **serengeor** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:34 pm

@stefbuet Looks great

Whats that red thing rotating around ?

stefbuet · Post by **stefbuet** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:38 pm

The red area is just not covered by the shadow calculation. In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders, 1 render can cover half of the scene, and here I just did 1 render as it was a test case.

ent1ty · Post by **ent1ty** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:22 pm

stefbuet wrote:In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders

I asked about this on IRC and they said it's impossible.
Fools.

Lonesome Ducky · Post by **Lonesome Ducky** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:41 pm

ent1ty wrote:
stefbuet wrote:In fact as I'm using dual paraboloid mapping, each point light needs 2 renders
I asked about this on IRC and they said it's impossible.
Fools.

Who said it was impossible? I was under the impression that dual paraboloid mapping was well known... They should be ashamed

ent1ty · Post by **ent1ty** » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:10 pm

Well i don't remember exact names, it was like a month ago or so.

wing64 · Post by **wing64** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:32 am

God Tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnaxGR81XE

Framework: ARSA
Rendering: irrlicht
Physics: PhysX

Jake-GR · Post by **Jake-GR** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:02 am

@wing64:
more closeups of the dancing chick hehe

Escen · Post by **Escen** » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:57 pm

@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive

Virion · Post by **Virion** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:40 am

wing64 wrote:God Tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AnaxGR81XE

Framework: ARSA
Rendering: irrlicht
Physics: PhysX

wondering... what's the game about? or is it just a demo showing physics?

Mel · Post by **Mel** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:54 pm

It has a bit low resolution. Other than that, it looks awesome

Good job Wing64!

wing64 · Post by **wing64** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:20 am

Thank you all.
@Virion:
A demo showing physics, shader and sandbox.

Virion · Post by **Virion** » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:40 am

wing64 wrote:Thank you all.
@Virion:
A demo showing physics, shader and sandbox.

i see. i thought it would be a fighting game where the level will shakes and things will fall down for increasing difficulty based on time.

Midnight · Post by **Midnight** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:53 pm

Escen wrote:@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive

A TEN!? for what?!

@wing64 - what in the hell is that supposed to be exactly?

@jake-GR - you need to get out more often!

Murloc992 · Post by **Murloc992** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:36 am

Midnight wrote:
Escen wrote:@wing64:
This is really nice, on a scale of ten, you got a ten... impressive
A TEN!? for what?!

@wing64 - what in the hell is that supposed to be exactly?

@jake-GR - you need to get out more often!

Burn yourself before it's not too late.

And go under your bridge, mister. To burn yourself.

cobra · Post by **cobra** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:59 pm

What Midnight is trying to say is that there is really nothing unique, ground-breaking, or technical in the video. So where the rating comes from is hard to tell.

The artwork is very nice; I'd give that an eight or nine.
Rating as a game, I'd give it zero. It's probably just starting its new life anyway, so that might be a premature rating.

Graphics before game-play is a dead game right off the bat, usually.

Sorry if that sounds harsh.