FXAA

pippy · Post by **pippy** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:55 am

Would't it be great if irrlicht had this on by default?

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/1 ... -fxaa.html

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:25 am

Why not try and implement it then?

hendu · Post by **hendu** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:26 am

No, because Jimenez's MLAA looks better

I find FXAA blurs too much, and the comments in that article seem to agree. SMAA is an improved version of their MLAA algo, I haven't yet implemented that though.

Radikalizm · Post by **Radikalizm** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:29 am

hendu wrote:No, because Jimenez's MLAA looks better I find FXAA blurs too much, and the comments in that article seem to agree. SMAA is an improved version of their MLAA algo, I haven't yet implemented that though.

MLAA is on my to-do list too, hadn't looked into SMAA yet
It's way back on the to-do list though, so it'll be a while before I start working on it

hendu · Post by **hendu** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:15 pm

SMAA 1x is a little slower and better quality than the earlier MLAA. The higher modes are both much slower and much better quality (still relative, even the slowest is faster than MSAA).

REDDemon · Post by **REDDemon** » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:52 pm

I tried both MLAA and FXAA. They are both good. Depending on the case one or the other looks better. You have lots of parameters for configure those PPAA. I really like FXAA for Xbox on PC because is fast.. On lower resolutions MLAA looks a bit better (just my opinion)

Cube_ · Post by **Cube_** » Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:23 am

Well... MLAA is nice. but costly. FXAA is to blurry. but so far SMAA seems nice.
more reading?
http://www.iryoku.com/smaa/

Irrlicht Engine

FXAA

FXAA

Re: FXAA

Re: FXAA

Re: FXAA

Re: FXAA

Re: FXAA

Re: FXAA